Delivery Time Models
The reply of a respondent is delivered i days after the launch of a direct marketing campaign due to the delay rate q and the delivery time d. Thus, in the geometric response model, the probability Pi that a respondent’s reply will be received on day i is
Equation (1-12)
where P[dj] is the probability mass function of the delivery time. In a special case in which the delivery is instant, the probability distribution becomes
Equation (1-13)
In such a case, we can simply have
Equation (1-14)
Let us consider three different probability mass functions of d with a single parameter. First, suppose that the delivery time d has a discrete uniform distribution as in Basu, Basu, and Batra (1995);
Equation (1-15)
where u is the upper limit of the uniform random variable. The delivery is instant if u=0. The expected value of the uniform delivery time is
Equation (1-16)
It follows from (1-12) and (1-15) that
Equation (1-17)
which can be simplified further as
Equation (1-18)
Second, suppose that the delivery time d has a geometric distribution:
Equation (1-19)
where r is a parameter, 0<r<1, to be estimated empirically. If r is close to zero, then the delivery time is negligible. The expected value of the geometric random variable is
Equation (1-20)
It follows from (1-12) and (1-19) that
Equation (1-21)
Third, suppose that the delivery time d has a Poisson distribution:
Equation (1-22)
where s is a parameter, s>0, to be estimated empirically. The delivery time is negligible if s is close to 0. The average delivery time in (1-22) is
Equation (1-23)
With the Poisson delivery time, it follows from (1-12) and (1-22) that
Equation (1-24)
Figure 1.3 illustrates the three probability distributions in which the average delivery time is E[d] = 2 days. Among the three distributions, the Poisson delivery in Figure 1.3(c) appears to be the most realistic in most practical situations.
Figure 1.3 Various delivery time distributions with E[d]=2 days.
Note that we may consider other discrete probability distributions with more than one parameter. For example, the negative binomial distribution has been widely used in various consumer behavior models (Wagner and Taudes 1987) and in product inspection models (Chun and Sumichrast 2007). However, we restrict our attention to the single-parameter delivery time to have a parsimonious response model. Thus, our geometric response model has only three parameters: response rate, delay rate, and delivery time. All of the parameters have meaningful interpretations. In the next section, we compare the performance of the three delivery time models using weekly response data and propose the best one.